To obtain a copy of a specific publication, users should contact the publication's publisher directly.
Abstract
The Army has a large inventory of buildings with low-slope membrane roofs. Eventually, most of these roofs will experience flaws that allow water intrusion. The cost resulting from water damage to the roofing system, structure, and building contents that can occur between the time a leak begins and is located and repaired can be very high. A passive roof leak detection system (PRLDS) could help Army managers by providiing early leak detection and could potentially reduce the Army's roofing maintenance budget. This study determined that a PRLDS contains four components: sensors, signal, transmission mediium, and signal processing unit. The sensors can be resistive, capacitive, circuit- bridging, or fiber optics. Sensor placement and spacing on a roof determine the system's "resolution" and should be based on the system cost and the interior use of the structure. A discussion of the reliability, compatibility, durability, and maintainability of components is included. This study also determined that several moisture-sensing technologies are feasible, including a water-activated battery/ transmitter, a variety of probes, moisture detection tape,and coated wires. Because little documented experience with these new technologies exists, it is recommended that field investigations be conducted and design specifications be developed.
The Army has a large inventory of buildings with low-slope membrane roofs. Eventually, most of these roofs will experience flaws that allow water intrusion. The cost resulting from water damage to the roofing system, structure, and building contents that can occur between the time a leak begins and is located and repaired can be very high. A passive roof leak detection system (PRLDS) could help Army managers by providiing early leak detection and could potentially reduce the Army's roofing maintenance budget. This study determined that a PRLDS contains four components: sensors, signal, transmission mediium, and signal processing unit. The sensors can be resistive, capacitive, circuit- bridging, or fiber optics. Sensor placement and spacing on a roof determine the system's "resolution" and should be based on the system cost and the interior use of the structure. A discussion of the reliability, compatibility, durability, and maintainability of components is included. This study also determined that several moisture-sensing technologies are feasible, including a water-activated battery/ transmitter, a variety of probes, moisture detection tape,and coated wires. Because little documented experience with these new technologies exists, it is recommended that field investigations be conducted and design specifications be developed.
Date
3/1994
3/1994
Author(s)
David Bailey; Jason Ditman; Rene Dupuis; Andrew Buckner
David Bailey; Jason Ditman; Rene Dupuis; Andrew Buckner
Page(s)
40
40
Keyword(s)
leak detection; passive roof leak detection system; PRLDS;
leak detection; passive roof leak detection system; PRLDS;